![]() ![]() ![]() Results: Data analysis showed a significant statistical difference in FOUR score and GCS score between survivors and nonsurvivors ( P 0.7 indicates a moderate prognostic model, and AUC value >0.8 (a bulbous curve) indicates a good prognostic model. Statistical Analysis Used: A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and Logistic regression were used in the statistical analysis (95% confidence interval). Materials and Methods: FOUR score, GCS score, and demographic characteristics of all patients were recorded in the first admission 24 h. Setting and Design: This was an observational and prospective study of 300 consecutive patients admitted to the MICU during a 14 months' period. Aim: The aim of the current study was to evaluate FOUR score and GCS ability in predicting the outcomes (Survivors, nonsurvivors) in Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU). Comparison of full outline of unresponsiveness score and Glasgow Coma Scale in Medical Intensive Care Unitġ School of Nursing and Midwifery, Bojnourd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bojnurd, Iran 2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, IranĬlick here for correspondence address andĬontext: The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is the most commonly used scale, and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score is new validated coma scale as an alternative to GCS in the evaluation of the level of consciousness.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |